June 3, 2012
An American perspective on construction job targeting
Canadian construction contractors may have advantages over their American counterparts because in the United States, the federal government has jurisdiction over collective bargaining, according to a labour lawyer.
Doug Seaton, an attorney with Seaton, Peters and Revnew in Minneapolis, delivered a presentation Saturday at the International Open Shop Conference in Ottawa.
He talked about strategies unions have used in the U.S. to put additional obligations on open shop firms, including the practice of having assessments deducted from wages granted to union signatory contractors to reduce the labour cost of targeted projects.
In Minnesota alone, in 2006-07, $109.26 million went into market recovery funds, which are intended to subsidize union contractors, he said.
There are also “responsible contractor” ordinances and laws, which are designed to put additional obligations on open shop firms.
When U.S. states have tried to control such practices, the authorities have generally ruled that those are collective bargaining matters, which are a federal responsibility. However, he said, states are allowed to set their own purchasing policies.
Seaton said Canadian contractors may have advantages in Canada due to the provincial responsibilities over collective bargaining.
Also presenting at the session, titled “Job Targeting Program: A Canada/U.S. Update” was Bill Stewart, vice-president of the Merit Contractors Association.
Stewart, who is from Alberta, praised the provincial government for addressing the practice in 2008 with the Labour Relations Amendment Act. This required that contributions to such funds could not be deducted from workers’ pay cheques without their consent, that deductions for marketing enhancement recovery funds, or MERFs, be on payroll records and unions cannot punish members for not contributing to a MERF fund.
With MERFs, the “whole integrity of the bid system gets compromised,” Stewart said.
In this week's update, we look at some of the stories we'll be covering in the Journal of Commerce for the week of December 16th, 2013.
The 24th CEO Power Breakfast at the 25th annual Construct Canada a brought group of some of the industrys senior executives together to discuss the current state and future of the industry.
The Independent Contractors and Businesses Association recently held its annual general meeting, and ICBA president Philip Hochstein was on hand to speak to the Journal of Commerce about the past year and his hopes for the industry in the year to come.
In this week's update, we look at some of the stories we'll be covering in the Journal of Commerce for the week of December 9th, 2013.
Jeff Lyth of the British Columbia Construction Safety Alliance was the final speaker at Bridging the Gap 2013, held recently in Richmond, British Columbia.
In this week's update, we look at some of the stories we'll be covering in the Journal of Commerce for the week of December 2nd, 2013.
Werner Hofstatter, the products and markets advisor for the Canadian Wood Council's Wood Works! BC Program, spoke to the Journal of Commerce at the Wood Solutions Fair, recently held at the Vancouver Convention Centre.
In this week's update, we look at some of the stories we'll be covering in the Journal of Commerce for the week of November 25th, 2013.
Canadian Institute of Steel Construction president Ed Whalen was on hand at the Converge 2013 conference in Vancouver to offer his thoughts on B.C.'s Wood First policy and other industry concerns.