June 1, 2009
Shift to carbon-neutral design requires new mindset, architecture professor says
The leap to “carbon-neutral” design requires a shift in mindset on the part of design professionals, says Terri Meyer Boake, associate director of the school of architecture at the University of Waterloo.
“Designing to zero-carbon standards requires a modified approach to current sustainable and high-performance design methods,” says Boake, also president of the Society of Building Science Educators.
Speaking at the Ontario Association of Architects’ (OAA) recent annual conference, Boake said green, sustainable and high-performance buildings “are not going far enough, quickly enough” in reducing their negative impact on the environment.
The Architecture 2030 organization has urged that all new buildings be carbon-neutral by 2030, using no fossil-fuel, greenhouse gas-emitting energy to operate. The OAA has endorsed the 2030 challenge.
While sustainable design is a holistic way of designing buildings to minimize their environmental impact, Boake said carbon neutrality focuses on the relationship between all aspects of building and carbon dioxide emissions.
A carbon-neutral building derives 100-per-cent of its energy from non fossil-fuel-based renewable energy sources.
At the moment, there are only eight documented institutional or commercial carbon-neutral buildings in the United States, Boake said. One example is the Aldo Leopold Legacy Center in Baraboo, Wis. The 11,900-square-foot centre is a carbon-neutral, net-zero energy building.
Boake, who teaches environmental design courses at Waterloo and is a member of the OAA’s committee for a sustainable built environment, said a sustainable building does not equate a carbon-neutral one.
She said four key strategies are required to design to a state of carbon neutrality.
•Reduce energy loads/demand first through such measures as conservation, passive heating and cooling strategies, daylighting, shading and building orientation.
•Meet loads efficiently and effectively through energy-efficient lighting, high-efficiency MEP (mechanical, electrical and plumbing) equipment and controls.
•Use renewable sources such as photovoltaics, solar hot water systems and wind energy, to meet energy needs.
•Use purchased offsets only as a last resort when all other means have been looked at on site or where the scope of building exceeds the site-available resources.
“As the way that buildings interact with carbon is highly complex, the first aim is to reduce operating energy as it is the most significant (factor) and easiest to control,” Boake said.
The leap to zero carbon design has implications on a number of fronts, in addition to incorporation of measures to reduce energy requirements.
Increased attention must be paid to building orientation, siting and site treatment both during and after construction.
Choice of materials also comes into play, Boake said. The scope of “acceptable” materials is narrower. Materials can help reduce a building’s carbon footprint.
“Wood from certified renewable sources, wood harvested from your property or wood salvaged from demolition and saved from the landfill can often be considered net carbon sinks.”
Planting new trees can help compensate for the carbon released during transport of essential materials while incorporating green roofs and living walls can assist in carbon sequestration.
By the same token, Boake said, reuse of a building, part of a building or its elements reduces the carbon impact by avoiding using new materials.
Design for disassembly and eventual reuse will offset future carbon use.
Designing to zero-carbon standards imposes a greater need for an integrated design process and co-ordination with consultants from the very outset of a project, Boake said.
“Carbon neutral cannot be done without the highest level of early and continued co-operation amongst the client, architect and engineers.”
The Society of Building Educators has set up a web site dedicated to explaining carbon-neutral design, examining building case studies and exploring carbon calculation tools and software.
The initiative is being funded by the American Institute of Architects.
|MOST POPULAR STORIES|
- Lafarge’s research tackles cement’s “bad boy” image
- Waterloo Region LRT work agreement almost done
- RFP released to shortlisted teams for Milton hospital expansion
- Upset waters over new Ontario diving regulations
- The Working Dead — construction of a post-apocalyptic zombie world
- 20 Most Popular Stories
|TODAY’S TOP CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS|
These projects have been selected from 371 projects with a total value of $1,936,826,394 that Reed Construction Data Building Reports reported on Thursday.
$134,000,000 Toronto ON Prebid
$128,250,000 North York ON Prebid
$100,000,000 Toronto ON Prebid
- Debate swirls over OCOT’s merit on its anniversary
- WaterGarden Worker
- Ontario to invest in cycling infrastructure
- U.S. construction labour concerns
- Compulsory certification in carpentry a “job killer”, says Kenney
- CaGBC to provide free LEED registration and certification for commercial projects in disaster-hit cities
- Economic cost of weather catastrophes is under appreciated: report
- Scotiabank sees slow growth in housing
- Photo Gallery: 2014 ACEC BC Awards of Excellence winners
- Journal of Commerce Preview for the week of April 21st, 2014
- Making Metro
- Crumbling roads a key election issue
- Early stages of concrete pump operator certification being developed in B.C.
- Legal battle over temporary foreign workers heats up
- Dive tower pushes formwork forward
- Understanding municipal strategy
- Calgary firm fined $35,000 for workplace injury
- B.C. labour minister calls for WorkSafeBC reforms
- B.C. prison proceeding