LATEST NEWS Roadbuilding
September 28, 2007
Engineers should provide “owner’s manuals” for infrastructure
From coffee makers to cars, Canadian consumers are accustomed to receiving an extensive set of instructions and maintenance schedules with their purchases.
The usual documentation that goes with a completed infrastructure project: nothing.
“As engineers, we build projects worth millions of dollars, but when have we ever provided the purchaser with a detailed owner’s manual,” asks Saeed Mirza, past chair of the Technical Committee on the Rehabilitation of Infrastructure for the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering and a McGill University professor. “We already know what kind of deterioration occurs from corrosion, freezing and thawing but these models aren’t being applied to predict the life-cycle of our infrastructure.”
Mirza, who spoke at the fourth annual Future of Canada’s Infrastructure conference in Toronto, notes consumers understand fully who is going to pay for maintaining their purchases. Less valuable items are easily replaced, while more valuable investments—like cars—will receive scheduled maintenance.
Putting off infrastructure maintenance for consideration by future generations is like waiting for your kids to grow up so they can pay for an oil change, he says. In some cases, Canadian infrastructure deficit estimates reflect the cost of deferring maintenance by 20, 50 or 100 years, then paying the bill all at once.
“It’s a normal business practice to consider depreciation,” says Mirza. “But if we examine water supply rates, for example, who pays for that depreciation? Shouldn’t the users pay the depreciation as the water is consumed?
“If deterioration of our infrastructure is allowed to occur without maintenance for 100 years or more, no source of funding will give us enough money to pay for replacing it all at once.”
Mirza notes that bridges designed to last 75 years are now only achieving life spans of 35 to 40 years due to lack of maintenance.
“Normal (annual) maintenance should be budgeted between two and four per cent of facility costs,” he says. “In Canada, the average is zero to two per cent.”
Mirza proposes a National Infrastructure Policy that forces builders and users alike to acknowledge infrastructure as a normal capital expenditure — complete with instruction booklet, projected depreciation costs and life cycle maintenance schedules.
|MOST POPULAR STORIES|
- Lafarge’s research tackles cement’s “bad boy” image
- Waterloo Region LRT work agreement almost done
- RFP released to shortlisted teams for Milton hospital expansion
- The Working Dead — construction of a post-apocalyptic zombie world
- Upset waters over new Ontario diving regulations
- 20 Most Popular Stories
|TODAY’S TOP CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS|
These projects have been selected from 371 projects with a total value of $1,936,826,394 that Reed Construction Data Building Reports reported on Thursday.
$134,000,000 Toronto ON Prebid
$128,250,000 North York ON Prebid
$100,000,000 Toronto ON Prebid
- Debate swirls over OCOT’s merit on its anniversary
- WaterGarden Worker
- Ontario to invest in cycling infrastructure
- U.S. construction labour concerns
- Compulsory certification in carpentry a “job killer”, says Kenney
- CaGBC to provide free LEED registration and certification for commercial projects in disaster-hit cities
- Economic cost of weather catastrophes is under appreciated: report
- Scotiabank sees slow growth in housing
- Photo Gallery: 2014 ACEC BC Awards of Excellence winners
- Journal of Commerce Preview for the week of April 21st, 2014
- Making Metro
- Crumbling roads a key election issue
- Early stages of concrete pump operator certification being developed in B.C.
- Legal battle over temporary foreign workers heats up
- Dive tower pushes formwork forward
- Understanding municipal strategy
- Calgary firm fined $35,000 for workplace injury
- B.C. labour minister calls for WorkSafeBC reforms
- B.C. prison proceeding