March 14, 2005
Mediation confidentiality tested by Ontario courts
One of the most important selling points of mediation was that it is totally confidential. None of the documents, discussions, and mediators involvement, could ever be revealed in any subsequent proceedings, or so the participants in mediation all thought.
Mediation agreements were carefully crafted to ensure total privacy, and to guard against anything said being repeated in any way.
That was what the clients and mediator have all agreed to and it was one of the pillars of the mediation process.
Recently, the confidentiality pillar was tested by the courts in Ontario.
In this case, one side stated that a mediation settlement had been reached by all parties.
The other side denied this and said that one K was not a party to the agreement.
The mediator had drafted the minutes of settlement in his own handwriting, leaving out the name of one defendant K on the signature page.
Counsel for the plaintiff stated the omission was simply inadvertence while the defendant’s lawyer stated K was never intended to be a party to the settlement.
An application was brought before the court to compel the mediator to testify as to what transpired at the mediation respecting the terms of the settlement reached, if any.
The court compelled the mediator to testify only with respect to the issue of whether K was a proper party to the settlement.
The conflicting principals of confidentiality and disclosure were suddenly in sharp focus.
The court went to elaborate pains to reconfirm that mediation must be confidential but said that confidentiality was not absolute when a settlement had been achieved.
The judge stated that the notions of privilege and confidentiality which cloak mediation sessions encourage parties to be frank and candid in seeking resolution without concern that, if no settlement is forthcoming, anything that they may have said at the mediation could be used against them.
However, once a settlement is achieved but its interpretation is in question, disclosure of mediation discussions may be necessary to ensure substantive justice.
In such circumstances, disclosure of discussions will not undermine the mediation process as it is sought not as an admission against a party’s interest, but solely for the purpose of determining the specific terms of an agreement that both parties have arrived at.
Having said that, since privilege and confidentiality are critical to the success of the mediation process, they should not be lightly disturbed.
Some evidence must be adduced on the motion to demonstrate that the mediator’s evidence is likely to be probative to the issue and that the benefit gained by the disclosure for the correct disposal of the litigation will be greater than any injury to the mediation process by the disclosure of discussions that took place.
This case will cause concern to the parties to mediation and to mediators who, up to now, considered everything in mediation proceedings to be confidential.
David I. Bristow is a partner with Team Resolution in Toronto — www.teamresolution.ca.
Phone: (416) 597-6585.
|MOST POPULAR STORIES|
- OPG $1 billion proposal to bury nuclear waste up for comment
- Hundreds of workers to be out of work as Caterpillar Inc. is set to close Toronto factory
- Proposed Ambassador Bridge twinning draws Windsor mayor’s ire
- Construction on pedestrian tunnel to Billy Bishop Airport continues to make progress
- Ontario prompt payment bill to get second reading today
- 20 Most Popular Stories
|TODAY’S TOP CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS|
These projects have been selected from 316 projects with a total value of $2,787,806,637 that Reed Construction Data Building Reports reported on Friday.
$90,000,000 Richmond Hill ON Prebid
$82,000,000 White River Twp ON Tenders
$40,650,000 Markham ON Prebid
- VIDEO: Economic Update May 21, 2013
- VIDEO: Competing in the trades
- Multi-employer approach needed in apprenticeships
- New Perspective
- ACEC’s input helps develop global engineering guidelines
- Clerk of works position gives peace of mind on projects
- World Trade Center developer’s plan for a 926-foot tower moving ahead
- Call for action after MOL says workers are responsible for their own safety
- Cold spring and weak construction hurt Deere’s 2013 predictions
- CanBIM reschedule June session
- More green roofs top Toronto buildings
- Witness recants testimony in Montreal corruption case
- Construction Site Arson
- Journal of Commerce Update for the week of May 20th, 2013
- Industry reacts to surprise B.C. Liberal majority
- Calgary Airport Tunnel
- Worker at centre of union sign up allegations speaks out
- Calgary program aims to get more people into the trades
- Midrise in the City
- Veterans battle barriers into the trades
- Government makes changes to online tendering
- SNC-Lavalin maintains that new bribery allegations have been resolved
- B.C. faces a tough battle for top talent
- Keyano College building state of the art training facility
- Essential skills can play a vital role in an apprentices' success
- Taking a closer look at the risks in green building for contractors
- Colleges conduct construction research in addition to teaching
- Skills Canada BC Competition
- Lower Mainland high school trades program is unique
- Construction Learning Forum aims to educate
- High schools looking for more industry participation
- Industrial construction supervisor program takes off
- Saskatchewan bill passed
- Edmonton garners support for regional cash for arena
- Feds pledge $5 million for Vimy memorial
|ALEX’S ECONOMICS BLOG|
Reed Construction Data Canada’s Chief Economist Alex Carrick discusses current developments in the North American economic environment with emphasis on the construction industry.
- An Overview of Prices and Sales in the Diverging U.S. and Canadian Housing Markets (April 25, 2013)
- Canada’s Precarious Dependence on the Commodity Price Super-Cycle (April 22, 2013)
- Twenty major upcoming residential and transportation terminal construction projects - April 2013 (April 15, 2013)