LATEST NEWS Professional Services
March 7, 2005
Who is entitled to a valid claim for lien?
Very recently an Ontario Court ruled that the work performed in removing hundreds of thousands of tires from a tire dump was an improvement to the land that qualified for a lien under the Construction Lien Act.
The cry went out: Where will this end if a tire remover is given a lien against the owners property?
To see how this matter unfolds we must go back to the Construction Lien Act itself. The Act says “a person who supplies services or materials to an improvement” has a lien for that improvement.
Improvement is defined as “any alteration, addition or repair to any land”.
The court held that removal of tires constituted both alteration and repair of the land.
Had the evidence ended there I would have concluded that the work was not lienable.
The court, however, heard evidence that the tires had been declared a contaminant within the meaning of the environmental protection act of Ontario, and the judge followed a 1998 case where contaminated soil was removed from the land, which work was found lienable.
Therefore contamination resting on the surface and that below the surface of the land were lumped into the same category.
This case may be pushing the envelope of lienability and therefore the motto for lien claimants lawyers should be: If in doubt register a lien. This would appear to be a good course to follow.
I was just advised by counsel on this case that the owner is appealing the judge’s verdict. Another article on this topic is likely to follow.
David I. Bristow is a partner with Team Resolution in Toronto. www.teamresolution.ca.
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org. (416) 597-6585.
|MOST POPULAR STORIES|
|TODAY’S TOP CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS|
These projects have been selected from 481 projects with a total value of $2,274,238,471 that Reed Construction Data Building Reports reported on Wednesday.
$150,000,000 Ottawa ON Negotiated
$135,000,000 Toronto ON Tenders
$82,000,000 Toronto ON Tenders
- VIDEO: Debate still strong as OCOT turns one
- Upset waters over new Ontario diving regulations
- Covering up the Celsius
- Frontier Oilsands Mine joint review panel raises concerns among some First Nations
- The rise of biomaterials in construction
- Doors open on latest PPP Canada funding
- U.S. builders’ confidence rises but is limited by tight credit and shortages of labour and lots
- Keystone XL opponents carve message
- RFP released to shortlisted teams for Milton hospital expansion
- Photo Gallery: 2014 ACEC BC Awards of Excellence winners
- Journal of Commerce Preview for the week of April 21st, 2014
- Fort McMurray airport terminal getting ready for take off
- B.C. government forms liquefied natural gas working group
- Kitimat residents vote against Northern Gateway pipeline
- Precast concrete enables net-zero homes
- Learning to dig safely can save lives
- Ex construction boss admits to collusion in government contracts
- P3 Fund launches
- Supreme court won't hear case involving construction mogul
- Minister spurns spat over plant